Kissinger: Defeat of ISIL more important than Assad ouster
Former US Secretary Of State Henry Kissinger argues that the United States strategy in Syria should focus more on defeating the Daesh (ISIL) terrorist network than removing President Bashar al-Assad.
“The destruction of ISIS is more urgent than the overthrow of Bashar Assad,” the veteran diplomat writes in an article published by the Wall Street Journal, using another acronym for the terror group.
The geopolitical pattern in the Middle East region “is now in shambles” with non-state actors such as ISIL seeking to impose their rule in Syria, Iraq, Libya and Yemen, Kissinger says.
“These conflicting trends, compounded by America’s retreat from the region, have enabled Russia to engage in military operations deep in the Middle East, a deployment unprecedented in Russian history,” he adds.
Kissinger argues that the Russian intervention stems from concerns that the collapse of the current Syrian government could bring ISIL into power in Syria and turn the whole Arab country into “a haven for terrorist operations, reaching into Muslim regions inside Russia’s southern border in the Caucasus and elsewhere.”
American foreign policy, the elderly statesman argues, appears “at odds” with all actors in the region, including “each of the Syrian parties over different objectives.”
A convoy of ISIL militants seen in Iraq’s Anbar Province (AP)
The United States has failed to generate effective leverage—political or military—to implement its long-held strategy of removing President Assad from power, he contends. “Nor has the U.S. put forward an alternative political structure to replace Mr. Assad should his departure somehow be realized.”
Russia, he says, merely stepped up to fill the vacuum left by the conflicting US policies.
“Whatever the motivation, Russian forces in the region—and their participation in combat operations—produce a challenge that American Middle East policy has not encountered in at least four decades,” he writes.
Washington accuses Moscow of running a “fundamentally flawed” campaign in Syria that could further escalate the conflict.